Table of contents
Chicago style annotated bibliography looks like a standard bibliography page. Main difference is that an author should create an annotation for each entry in the list. Namely, give an expanded summary of your cited source.
Usually, there’s no need to include annotations in professional academic papers. Most likely you will be up to creating this very page if you are a high school or college student.
That is why we will explain the topic using the Turabian guidelines examples.
Chicago style annotated bibliography is designed to share your knowledge of a cited source with a reader. When you refer to a specific source of information, you are familiar with the author and his background.
We can admit there are two ways of creating an annotation: using a descriptive and an evaluative approach. Let’s see how we make it in both styles.
By using a descriptive approach to your paper’s sources, you should sum up what your source is about and which significance it has. This information helps your reader understand the context you put this source in. Also, you can add some data about publication and the author.
While writing in an evaluative approach, you should bring in personal opinion regarding your source. Your feedback is subjective and should show more precisely, which place this source takes in your paper and why you refer to it. Mention general background information if needed.
As you have more than 1 option in creating your bibliography, its length can be different. Descriptive approach supposes writing quite brief and informative background, which can be about 50-100 words in length.
Evaluative approach gives you more room for expressing personal opinion. It may cause an enhanced word count. Usually, such pieces consist of 150-200 words.
General recommendation is using about 150 words. But the main point is to provide as much useful information regarding a cited source as possible. Remember that you need to stay concise and pick only important data or/and opinion.
As for Chicago style annotated bibliography formatting, follow basic style’s guidelines. Each entry should be like in a standard style’s bibliography. Let’s remind how we should format it:
Each entry should be comprised of the following elements in the corresponding order (all divided by periods):
As for your description or evaluation, follow these rules:
What does a Chicago style annotated bibliography look like? Here’s an example: